The rich intellectual environment at University of Wisconsin Law School is driven by a faculty of renowned legal scholars and innovative thinkers. They are the thought provokers. The idea generators. The pathbreakers who ask tough questions.
This stellar scholarly tradition makes UW Law the vibrant institution it is today.
Read Our 2025 Brochure
Jason Reinecke, Co-Authors Ask 'Can AI Hold Office Hours?'
Jason Reinecke, with co-authors Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Amy R. Motomura and Jonathan S. Masur, recently published "Can AI Hold Office Hours?" Rapid improvements in AI tools offer transformative opportunities in legal education, including the possibility of students using AI tools to answer questions they might otherwise ask during office hours. But a critical challenge is the accuracy of these tools' responses, write the authors. "Both general-purpose and law-specific AI models have been shown to 'hallucinate' incorrect responses to a range of legal questions," they continue. In this paper, the authors evaluate current capabilities of AI models when given the more constrained task of answering questions about a specific legal text. "We found that a substantial number of responses were unacceptable in the sense of being harmful for learning, and many more responses failed to fully answer the question or had minor errors," they wrote. The paper is forthcoming in the Journal of Legal Education.
Bridget Lavender On How SDRI Untangles Complex Research
Bridget Lavender, State Democracy Research Initiative (SDRI) staff attorney, joined the Wisconsin Law in Action podcast to provide a deep dive into the difficulties of researching, explaining and influencing state-level cases and statutes. Lavender highlights how it is SDRI's mission to fill the gap in legal research by focusing on state constitutions and state-level democracy. One great example is Lavender's explainer about whether states can prohibit federal agents from masking while on the job, updated to include recent case decisions. Most of the conversation centers on the legal complexity of states attempting to regulate federal law enforcement — such as mask bans on federal agents — and how the Supremacy Clause makes these questions highly fact-specific with no easy answers. She also discusses how SDRI's work — through amicus briefs, legal explainers, white papers and direct engagement with policymakers — shapes real-world legal outcomes, even when not directly cited. Listen and follow on SoundCloud or Apple Podcasts.
Arti Walker-Peddakotla on 'Surveillance Architectures'
Arti Walker-Peddakotla, Hastie Fellow at UW Law, recently published "Surveillance Architectures." The article argues that urban planning and architecture principles are part of the "shadow carceral state" and are linked to the decisions to enact urban surveillance. By viewing physical and virtual geographies from a critical perspective, this article "locates the invisible link between the design and behavioral regulation of physical space with decision to enact virtual surveillance," writes Walker-Peddakotla. Instead of separating urban planning decisions from a city's decision to enact urban surveillance, this article argues that surveillance by environmental design is one of the primary mechanisms that has created the ever-present, all-seeing surveillance state that we have today. The paper is forthcoming in the Wisconsin Law Review.
Kathryn Hendley on How Law Functions in the Real World
Kathryn Hendley, Roman Z. Livshits & Theodore W. Brazeau Professor of Law and Political Science, joined the Wisconsin Law in Action podcast for a wide-ranging conversation on how law actually functions in the real world — from the courts of post-Soviet Russia to the pressures facing legal institutions in the U.S. today. Drawing on decades of fieldwork, Hendley challenges the assumption that authoritarian legal systems are uniformly broken. As she puts it, "one of the myths that we have is that law works perfectly in this country and it doesn't work at all in authoritarian regimes." Her research reveals a more complicated truth: Even under repressive governments, ordinary people navigate courts, settle disputes and seek legal remedies in ways that look surprisingly familiar. In this episode, Hendley also examines what happens to lawyers and judges when democracy backslides, and what the U.S. can learn by looking abroad. Listen and follow on SoundCloud or Apple Podcasts.

