• About |
  • Dean's Welcome |
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison |
  • MyUW |
  • Directory


University of Wisconsin Law School
  • Law In Action
    • Our Tradition
    • Student Experience
    • Profiles
  • Prospective Students
    • JD Admissions
    • Graduate Programs
    • Transfer Students
  • Current Students
    • Career Services
    • Student Services
    • Student Organizations
  • Faculty
    • Faculty Directory
    • Faculty Resources
    • Scholarship
    • Workshops & Lectures
  • Alumni
    • Events & Reunions
    • Giving
    • Staying Connected
  • Academics & Programs
    • Course Schedule
    • Curriculum
    • Experiential Learning
    • Centers & Programs
  • Library
University of Wisconsin Law School
  • Frank J. Remington Center
    • About FJRC
      • Contact
      • Faculty & Staff
      • Giving
      • News
      • Newsletter
      • Featured Cases and Publications
      • History
    • Students
      • Academic & Application Info
      • Mandatory Meeting
      • Student Resources
    • Economic Justice Institute
    • Criminal Appeals Project
    • Family Law Project
    • Federal Appeals Project
    • Hayes Police-Prosecution Internship
    • Legal Assistance to Institutionalized Persons
      • Info for Students
      • Info for the Public
      • Pro Se Packets
    • Oxford Federal Project
    • Prosecution & Public Defender Projects
    • Re-entry Project
    • Restorative Justice Project
    • Wisconsin Innocence Project
      • Info for Students
      • Prevention
      • Representation
      • Resources
      • Wrongful Convictions/Exonerations
      • Wisconsin Criminal Justice Study Commission

LaVigne to Argue in Wisconsin Supreme Court

Posted 2009.3.2
Updated 2009.7.2

Clinical Professor Michele LaVigne will present argument as an amicus in the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Tuesday, March 3rd.  The case, State v. Hoppe, involves the adequacy of Wisconsin's Guilty Plea Questionnaire form and the duties of trial courts in accepting pleas.  Listen live from the Wisconsin Court's website http://www.wicourts.gov/opinions/sliveorals.htm

UPDATE:  The Supreme Court held that simply asking whether a defender read and signed the guilty plea form was insufficient to permit the trial court to find that a guilty plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary.  Instead the trial court has to personally engage the defendant to make sure the defendant has the proper level of understanding.

Log in to edit

University of Wisconsin Law School | 975 Bascom Mall, Madison, WI 53706 | (608) 262-2240 | Facebook | Twitter | Support UW Law School

Last Updated: Wednesday, November 9, 2011 | Copyright © 1998-2013 The University of Wisconsin Board of Regents. All Rights Reserved.