• About |
  • Dean's Welcome |
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison |
  • MyUW |
  • Directory


University of Wisconsin Law School
  • Law In Action
    • Our Tradition
    • Student Experience
    • Profiles
  • Prospective Students
    • JD Admissions
    • Graduate Programs
    • Transfer Students
  • Current Students
    • Career Services
    • Student Services
    • Student Organizations
  • Faculty
    • Faculty Directory
    • Faculty Resources
    • Scholarship
    • Workshops & Lectures
  • Alumni
    • Events & Reunions
    • Giving
    • Staying Connected
  • Academics & Programs
    • Course Schedule
    • Curriculum
    • Experiential Learning
    • Centers & Programs
  • Library
University of Wisconsin Law School
  • Frank J. Remington Center
    • About FJRC
      • Contact
      • Faculty & Staff
      • Giving
      • News
      • Newsletter
      • Featured Cases and Publications
      • History
    • Students
      • Academic & Application Info
      • Mandatory Meeting
      • Student Resources
    • Economic Justice Institute
    • Criminal Appeals Project
    • Family Law Project
    • Federal Appeals Project
    • Hayes Police-Prosecution Internship
    • Legal Assistance to Institutionalized Persons
      • Info for Students
      • Info for the Public
      • Pro Se Packets
    • Oxford Federal Project
    • Prosecution & Public Defender Projects
    • Re-entry Project
    • Restorative Justice Project
    • Wisconsin Innocence Project
      • Info for Students
      • Prevention
      • Representation
      • Resources
      • Wrongful Convictions/Exonerations
      • Wisconsin Criminal Justice Study Commission

Wisconsin Innocence Project Challenge to Bite-Mark Evidence Aided by DNA Test

Posted: 2008.07.10

The Wisconsin Innocence Project, led by Attorney Byron Lichstein, has brought new DNA evidence to challenge a 1984 murder conviction based on the controversial forensic technique of bite-mark analysis.

Lichstein has asked prosecutors to vacate the conviction of Robert Lee Stinson, whose DNA has been found not to be that in saliva found on the victim. A review of testimony from a dental scientist and law professor that convicted Stinson is under way, and the entire field of bite-mark comparison is being called into question. The only evidence against Stinson in his 1985 was the bite-mark analysis.

Forensic experts reviewing the case have found that "there is little or no correlation of Robert Lee Stinson’s dentition to the bite marks."

A detailed article on the case appears in the Chicago Tribune of Thursday, July 10, 2008, which can be read online at http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-bite-mark-exonerationjul10,0,2835607.story .

Log in to edit

University of Wisconsin Law School | 975 Bascom Mall, Madison, WI 53706 | (608) 262-2240 | Facebook | Twitter | Support UW Law School

Last Updated: Wednesday, November 9, 2011 | Copyright © 1998-2013 The University of Wisconsin Board of Regents. All Rights Reserved.