• About |
  • Dean's Welcome |
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison |
  • MyUW |
  • Directory


University of Wisconsin Law School
  • Law In Action
    • Our Tradition
    • Student Experience
    • Profiles
  • Prospective Students
    • JD Admissions
    • Graduate Programs
    • Transfer Students
  • Current Students
    • Career Services
    • Student Services
    • Student Organizations
  • Faculty
    • Faculty Directory
    • Faculty Resources
    • Scholarship
    • Workshops & Lectures
  • Alumni
    • Events & Reunions
    • Giving
    • Staying Connected
  • Academics & Programs
    • Course Schedule
    • Curriculum
    • Experiential Learning
    • Centers & Programs
  • Library
University of Wisconsin Law School
  • Frank J. Remington Center
    • About FJRC
      • Contact
      • Faculty & Staff
      • Giving
      • News
      • Newsletter
      • Featured Cases and Publications
      • History
    • Students
      • Academic & Application Info
      • Mandatory Meeting
      • Student Resources
    • Economic Justice Institute
    • Criminal Appeals Project
    • Family Law Project
    • Federal Appeals Project
    • Hayes Police-Prosecution Internship
    • Legal Assistance to Institutionalized Persons
      • Info for Students
      • Info for the Public
      • Pro Se Packets
    • Oxford Federal Project
    • Prosecution & Public Defender Projects
    • Re-entry Project
    • Restorative Justice Project
    • Wisconsin Innocence Project
      • Info for Students
      • Prevention
      • Representation
      • Resources
      • Wrongful Convictions/Exonerations
      • Wisconsin Criminal Justice Study Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court Cases

In 2005, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued two decisions related to the Commission's work.

State v. Jerrell, 2005 WI 105

On July 9, 2005, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that custodial interrogations of juveniles must be electronically recorded where feasible, and without exception when the interrogation occurs in a place of detention.  2005 WI 105.    With the decision, Wisconsin became the third state with some form of judicially-mandated recording.  Other states, including Illinois, New Mexico, Maine, and Texas have already addressed the issue through legislation, and more than a dozen other states will be considering such legislation this year.

State v. Dubose,
2005 WI 126

On July 14, 2005, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that eyewitness evidence obtained through use of a show-up is inadmissible unless conducting a show-up was necessary. 2005 WI 126.  Show-ups will be deemed unnecessary unless police lacked probable cause to arrest or other exigent circumstances prevented conducting a lineup or photo array.

Log in to edit

University of Wisconsin Law School | 975 Bascom Mall, Madison, WI 53706 | (608) 262-2240 | Facebook | Twitter | Support UW Law School

Last Updated: Monday, August 8, 2011 | Copyright © 1998-2013 The University of Wisconsin Board of Regents. All Rights Reserved.